On 25 Mar 02, Jason E. Stewart writes: > I would really like to see the make process embrace the full benefit > of automake and autoconf. Right now it sort of dabbles with it. I > don't know enough about overhauling the system, and I don't have an > enormous amount of time for such a project, but I am willing to > coordinate with someone who does have more experience with the GNU > make chain and make sure it gets added to CVS.
I think it would be a very big job. And one would have to have access to OS/390 (hah!) to test all the changes. > > *BUT*, is "make install" a red herring? Should $XERCESCROOT (i.e., > > the build dir) be the only way to access this package? > > make install should work just like any other tool that uses > automake/autoconf. I'll keep that in mind. Thanks, David --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
