Jason. > Are you willing to accept patches for DOM level 3 implementations Yes, but one second ...
Remember sometimes ago I've post a Apache C++ DOM Binding proposal? I am now reviewing the comment and trying to reorganize the IDOM (e.g. rename IDOM_DOMXXX to DOMXXX as discussed, this also matches the DOM L3 naming convention (e.g. DOMBuilder, DOMErrorHandler ... etc.)). Give me a few more days, and I will post the prototype in the mailing list for review. Then you can submit your patch based on this new prototype. Tinny ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason E. Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 1:30 PM Subject: DOM 3 Patches? > Hey Tinny et. al., > > Are you willing to accept patches for DOM level 3 implementations in > IDOM? I'd really like to add support for the new 'encoding', > 'version', and 'standalone' attributes of DOM_Document. That way I can > handle XML declarations properly. > > What say you? > > Thanks, > jas. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
