At 11.08 29/04/2002 -0400, you wrote: >Vote Question: >============ >I would like to call for a vote: > > ==> Which INTERFACE should be the Xerces-C++ public supported W3C > DOM Interface, DOM or IDOM? <===
I vote for IDOM. I like: - the speed - the virtual interface that will allow plugging any custom DOM implementation. But I fear that the fact that Xerces doesn't call the destructor for the single nodes (but only releases the memory underneath it) can pose a big limitation to the exploitation of the second advantage (because it will force the developer to include data members allocated only through the IDOM_Document::allocate function). Alberto > >Note: >1. The question is asking which "interface" to be officially >supported. Once the choice of interface is chosen, we can discuss how to >solve the downside of implementation as the next topic. >2. The one being voted will become the ONLY Xerces-C++ supported public >W3C DOM Interface, and is where the DOM Level 3 being implemented. >3. The API of the other interface will be deprecated. And its samples, >and associated Parser will eventually be removed from the distribution > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
