Re DOMNode versus DOM_Node naming conventions: I understand the desire to not break existing code, and I understand the desire to give the new interfaces the most "standard" name possible, but I'm just a bit nervous about this particular solution. I think that's going to be a bit error-prone. We're going to spend a lot of time explaining the difference between "DOM Node" (in the abstract), "DOMNode" (new interface), and "DOM Underscore Node" (old implementation)... and if we forget to explicitly say "Underscore" during a phone call, or if someone who doesn't understand the distinction tries to mix the two or simply leaves the underscore out as a typo, it's going to be a nuisance to discuss.
I have to admit that I don't yet have a better alternative to offer. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
