I have no opinion on the other stuff. I'm 'retired' these days, so I was just answering a technical question. I leave matters of policy and extension and all of that to the new owners.
-------------------------- Dean Roddey The Charmed Quark Controller Charmed Quark Software [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.charmedquark.com "If it don't have a control port, don't buy it!" ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Buck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 2:20 PM Subject: Re: Xerces C++ Exceptions not Exported > At 02:13 PM 5/14/2002 -0700, you wrote: > >The point I was making is that if the SAX2 parser needs them, then they > >should have been exported to begin with, and they only reason it was gotten > >away with is that the parser is only delivered as one monolithic DLL these > >days. But, in order to support separately buildable components, they would > >have to be exported to begin with and their not being is just an oversight > >that should be corrected. > > Gotcha. I guess I should submit a bug now for the item (a). > > What are your thoughts about the second two items? > > There is one thing that could make pluggable user defined parsers easier to > use: change the factory class so that one may register user defined parsers > with the factory, then look them up by name later. Good idea? I have a > working demo I could forward to you if you are interested. > > Bob > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
