Consider the document: <a:doc xmlns:a="http://www.mydomain.com/ns";> <a:element xmlns:a="http://www.mydomain.com/ns"/> </a:doc>
Obviously the second namespace declaration is redundant, and it can be argued that it doesn't really constitute a new startPrefixMapping event. However ContentHandler::startPrefixMapping is called for both namespace declarations. Is this considered correct behaviour? The SAX specification isn't very clear on the point. The question is relevant from the XML-C14N point of view. It is possible to write an XML-C14N processor as a ContentHandler driven by a SAX2 parser. I'm looking for a resolution as to which component should be responsible for suppressing redundant namespace declarations. EJP --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
