> -----Original Message----- > From: Tinny Ng [mailto:tng-xml@;ca.ibm.com] > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 12:38 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Proposal Review: Using C++ Namespace > > > The library naming convention has already been changed since > Xerces-C++ 2.0, > and so-name has been used wherever applicable. See > http://xml.apache.org/xerces-c/migrate_archive.html#LibraryChange200 for > details.
This an improvement in the 2.x.x series, each release only costs me a recompile, rather than a re-edit as it did in 1.x.x. However, it still costs me a recompile, because every release is a major release, rather than a minor or microrelease (i.e. when 2.2 drops, you will have to recompile all code that used 2.1 to use 2.2, even though the release numbers indicate that they should be compatible from a binary standpoint). It will be interesting to see how micro releases are handled, 2.1.1 become libxerces-c.so.21.1 or libxerces-c.so.211.0. Hopefully, the former. Thanks Brad --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
