cheers ... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Henry S. Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tom Moog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 12:21 PM Subject: Re: validator benchmarks
> > Although this leaves out a lot of parsers I would be interested to see > results for (some for legal reasons, no doubt), I note with some > interest that the Xerces C SAX Schema validator out-performs all the > DTD validators besides the Xerces C SAX DTD one, and the Xerces > Java SAX Schema validator is faster than all the other validators of > any stripe other than the Xerces C SAX DTD one. > > This actually seems too good to be true . . . > > ht > -- > Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh > W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team > 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 > Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ > [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tom Moog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 11:37 AM > Subject: validator benchmarks > > > > > > > Sarvega Inc (www.sarvega.com) has released two XML benchmarks > > that might be of interest. One covers XML Parsing & Validation > > Performance and the other XSLT Processor Performance. > > > > Both benchmarks have come out of internal work that we thought > > might be of more general interest. The studies survey commonly > > used and publicly available implementations of parsers and processors. > > > > You can obtain a copy of the reports on the Sarvega web site > > www.sarvega.com by selecting the [benchmarks] button at the top. > > You will have to register before downloading the studies. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
