Guess this qualifies as ur-type or any-type.
Kiran
-----Original Message-----
From: Gareth Reakes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 1:10 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Schema problem
Hi,
sqc, xercesC and xercesJ all report that this is OK. I also think
it is OK (much less of a thumbs up!).
Gareth
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Bagepalli, Kiran wrote:
> If I have a local declaration with no type(either a simple or complex
type),
> I get no error from TraverseSchema.
>
> <xsd:element name="name"/>
>
> Is this not illegal?
>
> Thanks
> Kiran
>
>
>
>
--
Gareth Reakes, Head of Product Development +44-1865-203192
DecisionSoft Limited http://www.decisionsoft.com
XML Development and Services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
