XMLUri is supposed to be conformant to RFC2396. If it's not, then it's a bug and please open a bugzilla defect.
Tinny ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jennifer Schachter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 6:28 AM Subject: RE: rfc 1808 and rfc 2693 -- urls (fwd) > Hi, > > I'm quite certain that there are problems with XMLUri and XMLURL in Xerces > 2.0. I found them when trying to use this constructor from XMLUri: > > XMLUri::XMLUri ( const XMLUri *const baseURI, const XMLCh *const uriSpec) > > For the first parameter I have a pointer to a valid baseURI, and am > passing in a relative URI as the second parameter. > > I found, when using the test cases from rf2693 Appendix C, that newly > constructed URI's text (using getUriText) does not match the results given > in the rfc. > > ex. base URI="http://a/b/c/d;p?q"; and relative URI = "g:h". rfc says this > should be resolved as "g:h" when actually the text returned is > "http://a/b/c/g:h"; > > I also found that there were similar issues when running the test cases > using this constructor from XMLURL: > > XMLURL (const XMLCh *const baseURL,const char *const relativeURL) > > I did post about this before, but no one got back to me and I haven't had > a chance to have an indepth look at this yet... > > Thanks! > > Cheers, > Jennifer > > > On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Brad Settlemyer wrote: > > > I'd have to look more closely at xerces, but I believe it requires things > > like this > > > > file:///file.xsd (which is perhaps legal, but probably not) > > > > when it means > > > > file:/file.xsd > > > > and it allows things (encourages them I think) like > > file://file.xsd > > > > which is illegal (or at least I think 2693 it says that). > > > > Of course I've not used the xerces 2.0, so it may be different, and I'm not > > currently using any urls with xerces so I'll have to look thru some of my > > stuff at home to make sure the above examples are valid or not in xerces, > > but I was talking to the guy who implemented all the URL stuff on kde, and > > he was showing me alot of mistakes I was making in forming filesystem URLs. > > > > Brad > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Jesse Pelton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 2:21 PM > > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > Subject: RE: rfc 1808 and rfc 2693 -- urls > > > > > > > > > What are the differences? Are they material or significant? I thought 2396 > > > (not 2693) basically cleaned up 1738 and 1808, but didn't > > > introduce anything > > > new. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Brad Settlemyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 1:07 PM > > > To: [List] Xerces-C List > > > Subject: rfc 1808 and rfc 2693 -- urls > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > It appears that currently xerces supports rfc 1808 when it comes to > > > uri/urls, is there any reason to upgrade to rfc 2693, or any plan in place > > > to do that. I don't have a specific problem, I was just > > > interested to hear > > > if there was any interest to upgrade (or if perhaps the upgrade > > > has already > > > occurred in a version since 1.7.2)? > > > > > > RFC 1808 - http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/cgi-bin/rfc/rfc1808.html > > > RFC 2693 - http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/rfc/2396/full.html > > > > > > Thanks, > > > -- > > > Brad Settlemyer / Software Developer > > > Stronghold Technologies > > > 46040 Center Oak Plaza, Ste 160 / Sterling, VA 20166 > > > Phone: 703-547-0142 / Fax: 571-434-1478 > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- > Jennifer "Georgina" Schachter, Software Engineer +44-1865-203192 > DecisionSoft Limited http://www.decisionsoft.com > XML Development and Services > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
