Sure, that would solve my problem ... I'm in the midst of configuring a system right now that I can compile xerces w/ gcc on, so you don't need to go through the trouble unless you feel it would be useful to others! I was kind of interested in seeing if the Intel compiler felt any faster when using xerces ... and disappointed that the libcxa was missing!

Thanks for the quick response - I really appreciate it!

Brice

Gareth Reakes wrote:
Hi,
	we do a nightly build compiled with gcc at 

   1. http://software.decisionsoft.com/nightly/xerces/

. Ill get our sys admin to chuck up a stable 2_2 build and look at putting 
it onto the downloads section. Will this solve your problem?

Gareth


On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Brice Ruth wrote:

  
I just downloaded the 'Proton' build of xerces, to pop onto a Linux 
system that is currently compiler-less. Unfortunately, it appears that 
the libxerces-c library is linked dynamically with an Intel compiler 
library, libcxa.so.1. Is there a particular reason that this isn't 
linked in statically using -static-libcxa, or that libcxa is not 
provided w/ the xerces distro? The latter may be because of licensing 
terms on Intel's part.

Also, short of (a) recompiling xerces with gcc or (b) installing the 
Intel compiler, is there any other way to get the libcxa that this was 
compiled against? For one - I can't find v6 of the Intel compiler - 
their site only lists v7 available for download.

Cheers!
Brice


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


    

  

Reply via email to