Hi Brice,
gcc3x and gcc 2.96 are not binary compatible. You should build everything
with the same version of gcc, so you probably want to rebuild Xerces with
gcc 2.96.
Dave
Brice Ruth
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.com> cc: (bcc: David N
Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM)
Subject: Exceptions not caught when
parsing (gcc2 v. gcc3 on Linux)
03/05/2003 07:12
AM
Please respond
to xerces-c-dev
I've read that there are some problems with exceptions being raised in
the xerces library when using gcc2 v. gcc3. My question (since I'm not a
compiler expert), is if I can compile xerces with gcc3 on a RedHat 8
system (since that's the earliest RedHat release supporting gcc3) and
subsequently compile against the xerces library using gcc2 (2.96 to be
precise) on a RedHat 7.1/7.2 based system. Is this legit? Will this
allow me to catch the exceptions that appear to be crashing the
application now? My current xerces library is compiled with gcc 2.96.
Any clarity on this would be greatly appreciated!!
Respectfully,
Brice Ruth
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exceptions not caught when parsing (gcc2 v. gcc3 on Linux)
David N Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM Wed, 05 Mar 2003 08:28:59 -0800
- Exceptions not caught when parsing (gcc2 v. ... Brice Ruth
- Re: Exceptions not caught when parsing ... David N Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM
- Re: Exceptions not caught when pars... Brice Ruth
- Re: Exceptions not caught when ... David N Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM
- Re: Exceptions not caught w... Brice Ruth
- RE: Exceptions not caught when parsing ... Radovan Chytracek
