I guess this is more of a C++ question .... As of now, the delete may not be a prob. But by invoking delete [] you are assuming that a new [] was used to allocate your string. May make your code incompatible with other transcoders / versions of xerces etc...
-Vinayak > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 5:28 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Yet another XMLString::release question > > > > Is there any advantage to calling release over simply calling delete? > > For example: > > char *pMsg = XMLString::transcode(m_Node->getNodeValue()); > XMLString::release(&pMsg); > > versus > > char *pMsg = XMLString::transcode(m_Node->getNodeValue()); > delete []pMsg; > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
