Thanks,
I ran a few simple tests, and they appeared to be the same....but I figured
the behavior was implementation specific and thought I better check.
"Erik Rydgren"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
darinen.se> cc:
Subject: RE:
DOMNode::removeChild(oldChild) etc
05/30/2003 02:18
AM
Please respond to
xerces-c-dev
With a quick look it seems like it is the same object that is returned.
Regards
Erik Rydgren
Mandarinen systems AB
Sweden
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 29 maj 2003 22:39
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DOMNode::removeChild(oldChild) etc
I have a question about removeChild and other functions like it. Are the
oldChild DOMNode* passed into the function and the DOMNode* returned by the
function identical? Or is a new node allocated in the parser? I am asking
b/c in my wrapper functions I need to know if I can just return the input
node or not.
Thanks!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
