DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20684>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20684 Suggestion to optionally avoid a dependency on iostreams ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-16 12:13 ------- It seems then that we should remove this dependancy. I see no down sides. Even if a new dependancy is introduced later then this code will still be faster. And without an existing dependancy people will more carefully consider adding one. Does everyone agree with this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
