Hi Matthias, IANA's official list of character set names [1] lists UTF-16LE; neither UTF-16-LE nor UTF-16(LE) are listed. Does Xerces-C really produce the latter, and not UTF-16LE? I'm just wondering if you used the parentheses as a kind of emphasis. If we are using that formalism, I think we have a bug, and I'd encourage you to open a Bugzilla entry about it.
Cheers, Neil [1]: http://www.iana.org/assignments/character-sets Neil Graham XML Parser Development IBM Toronto Lab Phone: 905-413-3519, T/L 969-3519 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |---------+----------------------------> | | "Matthias | | | Niggemeier" | | | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | | | | | | 07/10/2003 03:13 | | | PM | | | Please respond to| | | xerces-c-dev | | | | |---------+----------------------------> >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | | cc: | | Subject: Processing instruction | | | | | >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| Hi there! When I save an XML-File as UTF-16, the encoding is written as "UTF-16(LE)". But when I load the file in XMLSpy, it claims that the file is not well-formed and insists on "UTF-16-LE". Who is wrong, XMLSpy or Xerces? Greetings Matthias #### smime.p7s has been removed from this note on July 10 2003 by Neil Graham
smime.p7s
Description: Binary data
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
