I have compiled static lib successfully ( or it seems that I compiled ), just right now but I do not know what the damage is, have to try it first, but sometimes code meant to be run as DLL ( shared lib ) due to different design specification, it might not be possible.
-----Original Message----- From: Damian Saura [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 12:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: xerces 2.3.0 Win32 static library, possible? this is exactly what I'm needing too :) it should be considered to add this on the package, I think if it compile as a static lib the linker will strip all unused code automatically... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Maksim Likharev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 3:31 PM Subject: xerces 2.3.0 Win32 static library, possible? Hi, I just wondering is there any problems in compiling xerces as static lib? I reality I have only application and I just do not want to have another dependency ( dll ). Another very interesting question, if I compile DLL and I want to use let say SAX2 only, is there any simple way how I can exclude classes from the build, make dll smaller Thank you. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
