Hi,
I have reproduced this problem. I can make the working one break
just by adding a "test" element before the body. I will review the code
and see if I can see anything, but I doubt this is going to be a 2 second
fix.
Cheers,
Gareth
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Heeg, Michael wrote:
> Hi Garth,
>
> attached you can find three files:
> 1) schema (schema.xsd)
> 2) one file which works (works.fih)
> 3) one file which leads to a crash (crashes.fih)
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Michael
>
>
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Gareth Reakes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. April 2004 10:37
> > An: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Betreff: Re: Strange problem with pattern (Xerces 2.5.0 crashes)
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> > can you post a working schema and instance file
> > (preferably small)
> > and I will take a look.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Garth
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Heeg, Michael wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am using Xerces-C 2.5.0 in my MS Visual C++ application.
> > When validating
> > > XML files against a specified schema, the parser sometimes
> > crashes with an
> > > "unexpected exception". I found out that the reason for the
> > crashes is the
> > > following restriction of the schema (see "Body" element):
> > >
> > > <xsd:complexType name="InputFileType">
> > > <xsd:sequence>
> > > <xsd:element name="Head" type="HeadType"/>
> > > <xsd:element name="Body">
> > > <xsd:simpleType>
> > > <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
> > > <xsd:pattern
> > >
> > value="(\n*[0-9]*,[0-9]*,(\-*[0-9]*\.*[0-9]*,)*\-*[0-9]+\.*[0-
> > 9]*;\n*)*"/>
> > > </xsd:restriction>
> > > </xsd:simpleType>
> > > </xsd:element>
> > > </xsd:sequence>
> > > </xsd:complexType>
> > >
> > > The restriction is defined to validate <Body> tags like the
> > following:
> > >
> > > <Body>
> > > 0,10,0.199,10.199,0.008;
> > > 1,20,0.389,20.389,0.059;
> > > 2,30,0.565,30.565,0.180;
> > > 3,40,0.717,40.717,0.369;
> > > 4,50,0.841,50.841,0.596;
> > > 5,60,0.932,60.932,0.810;
> > > ....
> > > </Body>
> > >
> > > The strange thing is: when the <Body> tag contains a large
> > amount of data,
> > > the validation of the restriction leads to the unexpected
> > exception. But:
> > > with a small amount of data, everything works fine. (Also:
> > when I delete the
> > > restriction from the schema, everything works fine.)
> > >
> > > For me this looks like a Xerces bug?! Am I wrong? Any suggestions or
> > > comments?
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Michael
> > >
> > >
> > > P.S.: I know that the way we use this <Body> tag is not the
> > best way to
> > > handle csv-like data, but I had to do this because of an
> > existing file
> > > format.
> > >
> > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Gareth Reakes, Managing Director Parthenon Computing
> > +44-1865-811184 http://www.parthcomp.com
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
--
Gareth Reakes, Managing Director Parthenon Computing
+44-1865-811184 http://www.parthcomp.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
