You're right, "has a" makes a lot more sense. I'm going to have to wait for the next point release to use mTranscoder, but where can I find this LCP adapter? A couple greps didn't turn it up.
An adapter will certainly get me past my current development issues, but that doesn't soothe the interface gap between the high-level LCP and the low-level XML transcoders. It would be nice if there was a rough symmetry between the two, perhaps transcodeFrom(char*) in LCP and transcodeFrom(XMLByte*, etc...) in XML. Maybe another adapter could allow the simplicity of the LCP functions, but not be bound to a specific code page. Adam Heinz Senior Software Developer Exstream Software --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
