Hi Adam,

my preference is to always include public headers in <>. I think its a style thing (unless anyone has a reason). If no-one objects I will happily commit your patches.

Gareth

Adam Heinz wrote:

What's the common opinion on mixing user includes with system includes?  For example, 
xercesc/dom/DOMAttr.hpp contains:

#include <xercesc/util/XercesDefs.hpp>
#include "DOMNode.hpp"

I'm using fairly strict compiler settings in Codewarrior 8.3, MacOS 10.2; notably, that I do not allow user and system includes to be mixed and matched. Currently, I do not see any reason why

#include <xercesc/util/XercesDefs.hpp>
#include <xercesc/dom/DOMNode.hpp>

would be less preferred than the above.  If nobody objects, I'll put in a defect and 
start submitting patches.

Adam Heinz
Senior Software Developer
Exstream Software


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- Gareth Reakes, Managing Director Parthenon Computing +44-1865-811184 http://www.parthcomp.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to