> Yes, resources are a major issue. What people should realize as well is > that we can't just go and check a patch in. We have to ensure its OK > with regards to the appropriate standard. As everyone knows, the schema > specs are not the most readable documents in the world :), so schema > bugs face this problem more than other DOM related bugs.
I totally understand that, believe me. If I sounded a little harsh originally, I apologize, it wasn't my intent to criticize so much as elicit some sense as to where the schema issues fit on the list of work. Xerces-J simply has better schema support right now, and if -C isn't able to devote the resources to catch up, that's something I have to deal with somehow. It seemed like a good time to ask the question, with a new release apparently in the offing. Speaking for myself, I think it would be nice to see some kind of policy about making sure that all open bugs are at least reviewed (and if possible commented on) before a major release. That way people with major bugs know whether they can count on a fix or whether they need to really devote their own time to it. -- Scott --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
