On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:15:06 +0100, Gareth Reakes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > this is expected behavior. The rational is that recycling the > pointer/memory is expensive in comparison to the likelihood of it being > required.
That explains it. I've got a program where I'm accessing the the xml file throughout the entire runtime of program. The problem I'm running into is the memory footprint keeps growing. For a smaller xml file, releasing the parser and reparsing would not be a problem but this is a one megabyte and growing xml file. Any suggestions on how to approach this problem? Thanks Hua-Ying --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
