Hi,

I cannot think of a way of doing this without changing the code base.

Gareth

Lei Jiang wrote:

>Hi everyone,
>
>I have a rather silly question:
>
>Is there a workround if I want to be able to use numbers as element names?
>
>
>I'm writing a WebDAV client libray, which uses Xerces-C to parse XML
>response from different servers. Some days ago someone wrote me and
>complained that my library kept raising DOM exceptions while he was
>trying to connect to a MS Exchange2000 server. It turned out that
>Exchange2000 is using some element names like "0x001a". It is obviously
>a violation to XML specification. But since Xerces-C is quite a big
>library, I think chances are there might be a way to live with this MS
>reality.
>
>I use XercesDOMParser as my parser so I checked the documentation. But
>to my dissapointment, there is no such method in Grammar to bypass name
>check. And the exception turned out to be raised from
>DOMDocumentImpl::isXMLName() which in turn calls
>XMLChar1_0::isValidName(), nothing related to Grammar. Here is a stack
>trace showing where and how the exception is raised:
>
>
>#0 xercesc_2_6::DOMElementNSImpl::setName (this=0x8935698,
>namespaceURI=0x8948100, qualifiedName=0x8948640)
>at DOMElementNSImpl.cpp:228
>#1 0x00bbcb8f in DOMElementNSImpl (this=0x8935698, ownerDoc=0x8934ad8,
>namespaceURI=0x8948100,
>qualifiedName=0x8948640) at DOMElementNSImpl.cpp:46
>#2 0x00bae943 in xercesc_2_6::DOMDocumentImpl::createElementNS
>(this=0x8934ad8, fNamespaceURI=0x8948100,
>qualifiedName=0x8948640) at DOMDocumentImpl.cpp:571
>#3 0x00b675d2 in xercesc_2_6::AbstractDOMParser::createElementNSNode
>(this=0x892cb00, namespaceURI=0x8948100,
>qualifiedName=0x8948640) at AbstractDOMParser.cpp:1124
>#4 0x00b6695f in xercesc_2_6::AbstractDOMParser::startElement
>(this=0x892cb00, [EMAIL PROTECTED], urlId=7,
>elemPrefix=0x892fc88, [EMAIL PROTECTED], attrCount=0, isEmpty=false,
>isRoot=false) at AbstractDOMParser.cpp:897
>#5 0x00c1150f in xercesc_2_6::IGXMLScanner::scanStartTagNS
>(this=0x892d978, [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>at IGXMLScanner.cpp:2745
>#6 0x00c0d525 in xercesc_2_6::IGXMLScanner::scanContent (this=0x892d978)
>at IGXMLScanner.cpp:886
>#7 0x00c0b956 in xercesc_2_6::IGXMLScanner::scanDocument
>(this=0x892d978, [EMAIL PROTECTED]) at IGXMLScanner.cpp:204
>#8 0x00cc7581 in xercesc_2_6::XMLScanner::scanDocument (this=0x892d978,
>systemId=0x8933688) at XMLScanner.cpp:412
>#9 0x00cc7623 in xercesc_2_6::XMLScanner::scanDocument (this=0x892d978,
>systemId=0x80544a3 "./ill.xml")
>at XMLScanner.cpp:420
>#10 0x00b65610 in xercesc_2_6::AbstractDOMParser::parse (this=0x892cb00,
>systemId=0x80544a3 "./ill.xml")
>at AbstractDOMParser.cpp:510
>
>
>Can anyone tell me if it's possible? Any clue or hint?
>
>
>Thanks a lot.
>
>
>Lei
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>  
>

-- 
Gareth Reakes, Managing Director      Parthenon Computing
+44-1865-811184                  http://www.parthcomp.com 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to