Just curious: how many Sun Sr. MTS folks have shown historical interest in the project? And why didn't the approach come from that quadrant?
While "market engineering" is good; it is my suggestion that "XML software engineering" would be more helpful in our context.
And, also, Alberto, the VMware/gcc/x86 comment was downright nasty! I bet Viet could get you a "discount" on SPARC/Forte(SunOne?); probably a discount on training, too!
I would have problems fitting it in my office ;-); but it would be nice if Sun donated a bunch of Solaris hardware and OS (Solaris 8, 9, 10) to Apache so that we can work on them remotely... (hint hint http://www.apache.org/dev/proposed-machines.html#Build)
Alberto
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 12:36:42 +0000 Gareth Reakes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey, > > Alberto Massari wrote: > > At 09.45 18/02/2005 +0000, Gareth Reakes wrote: > > > >> Hi Viet, > >> > >> There is no project manager as such. There are a group of > >> committers and the user community. We all discuss what should > >happen > next and then decide if we have the resources to implement > >it (much > like the discussion at the moment). Does anyone know if we > >do support > solaris 10? If not, then we are about to change the > >build system to a > configure/make/make install one. Would you be > >interested in > contributing resource to that effort? > > > > > > Last week (or so) I installed Solaris 10 x86 under VMWare and tested > > > > Xerces (btw, I was trying to reproduce a transcoder bug happening > > under Solaris 8); I compiled the library using the gcc 3.4 that > > ships with the OS, and the build went fine. > > > > So I guess we can say Solaris 10 is supported ;-)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
