On Feb 20, 2005, at 2:17 AM, Jason E. Stewart wrote:
Hey All, Email #2 in my series... The current ASF repos at: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ has all the TLP's as top-level projects. Since Xerces-C is officially still part of XML and not it's own TLP (true??), we would go under
Gareth, can you confirm status on this issue?
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xml/xerces-c The current suggested repository style is to have trunk/ branches/ tags/ site/ under the project directory. site/ would contain the website pages, while trunk is the current HEAD, branches have any other active branches, and tags all the historical tags.
This sounds good. And I'm not completely against keeping all of our tags, as I don't think xerces-c has gone overboard in tagging/branching in the past. svn is a little different from cvs, however, in that if you check out the entire tree you'll get local copies in full of each tagged copy--a good reason not to check out the whole tree.
Doing cvs log -l doc/index.html, I see the following tags:
Xerces-C_2_6_0: 1.2
Xerces-C_2_5_0: 1.2
Xerces-C_2_4_0: 1.2
Xerces-C_2_3_0: 1.2
Xerces-C_2_2_0: 1.2
Xerces-C_2_1_0: 1.2
Xerces-C_2_0_0: 1.2
Xerces-C_1_7_0: 1.2
Xerces-C_1_6_0: 1.2
Xerces-C_1_5_2: 1.2
Xerces-C_1_5_1: 1.2
Xerces-C_1_5_0: 1.2
Xerces-C_1_4_0: 1.2
xerces-c-1_3_0d04: 1.2
xerces-c-1_3_0d03: 1.2
Xerces-C_1_3_0_d02: 1.2
Xerces-C_1_2_0: 1.2
Xerces-C_1_1_0: 1.2
Xerces-C_1_1_0_d17: 1.2
Xerces-C_1_1_0_d016: 1.2
Xerces-C_1_1_0_d015: 1.2
Xerces-C_1_1_0_d014: 1.2
Xerces-C_1_1_0_d06: 1.2
Xerces-C_1_1_0Beta: 1.2
Xerces-C_1_1_0_d05: 1.2Maybe we'd like to clean house and get rid of the _dxxxx and Beta tags for the 1.x line? That seems like ancient history. We might also do something like move create a tags/releases directory to hold the tagged releases. Thoughts?
This also means that when Xerces becomes a TLP, the xml/xerces-c/ directory can be renamed to xerces/xerces-c/ and then xerces/xerces-j/ can be added. Eventually xml/xerces-p/ can be folded into xerces-c during the 3.0 migration. <aside> So are people are comfortable with this?
Relatively so, though it'd be interesting to hear some more comment on the above...
-jdb
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
