mrglavas 2003/10/26 19:24:05
Modified: java/src/org/apache/xerces/impl/msg
XMLSchemaMessages.properties
Log:
Fixing Bug #23947.
There were some typos in the message for e-props-correct.4.
Patch submitted by Gareth Reakes.
Revision Changes Path
1.71 +2 -2
xml-xerces/java/src/org/apache/xerces/impl/msg/XMLSchemaMessages.properties
Index: XMLSchemaMessages.properties
===================================================================
RCS file:
/home/cvs/xml-xerces/java/src/org/apache/xerces/impl/msg/XMLSchemaMessages.properties,v
retrieving revision 1.70
retrieving revision 1.71
diff -u -r1.70 -r1.71
--- XMLSchemaMessages.properties 18 Jun 2003 22:13:44 -0000 1.70
+++ XMLSchemaMessages.properties 27 Oct 2003 03:24:05 -0000 1.71
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@
enumeration-required-notation = enumeration-required-notation: The NOTATION
type, ''{0}'' used by {2} ''{1}'', must have an enumeration facet value which
specifies the notation elements used by this type.
enumeration-valid-restriction = enumeration-valid-restriction: Enumeration
value ''{0}'' is not in the value space of the base type, {1}.
e-props-correct.2 = e-props-correct.2: Invalid value constraint value
''{1}'' in element ''{0}''.
- e-props-correct.4 = e-props-correct.4: The '{'type definition'}' of element
''{0}'' is not validly derived from the '{'type definition'}' of the substitutionHead
''{1}'', or the {substitution group exclusions} property of ''{1}'' does not allowed
this derivation.
+ e-props-correct.4 = e-props-correct.4: The '{'type definition'}' of element
''{0}'' is not validly derived from the '{'type definition'}' of the substitutionHead
''{1}'', or the '{'substitution group exclusions'}' property of ''{1}'' does not allow
this derivation.
e-props-correct.5 = e-props-correct.5: There must not be a '{'value
constraint'}' on element ''{0}'', because its '{'type definition'}' or '{'type
definition'}'''s '{'content type'}' is ID, or is derived from ID.
e-props-correct.6 = e-props-correct.6: Circular substitution group detected
for element ''{0}''.
fractionDigits-valid-restriction = fractionDigits-valid-restriction: In the
definition of {2}, the value ''{0}'' for the facet ''fractionDigits'' is invalid,
because it must be <= the value for ''fractionDigits'' which was set to ''{1}'' in one
of the ancestor types.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
