Sorry, I remember the discussion and I really didn't mean wstring, it just slipped out.
-----Original Message----- From: Andy Heninger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 12:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: xalan-c Problem with Xerces initialization Curt Arnold wrote > I had previously mentioned making DOMString's semantics match that of a > subset of wstring, so that a user could have a familiar behavior and it > would be possible (though not tested and supported) that you could redefine > DOMString to be derived from wstring. I haven't had any free time recently, > but I could take a shot at scoping the effect. Is it worth trying? > Referring to Dean's note on More Xerces-C character encoding discussion, we can't use wstring because we can't rely on wchar_t holding Unicode values. basic_string<XMLCh> would avoid this, but wouldn't interoperate with APIs expecting wstring. -- Andy
