Pier,
Somebody said that there's already a case where somebody is using
"java" or "javax" in a package name for the purposes of cloning the
JDK. If this is already the case, I'd say we can do the same (+1). If
this is not the case, and there are any known cases where Sun has
publically objected to using the name "java" or "javax" in a cloned
package name, then I think we should wait (-1).
Mike
Pierpaolo Fumagalli wrote:
>
> Ted Leung wrote:
> >
> > * JAXP Wrappers for Xerces
> > pending resolution of licensing issues
>
> There's nothing in the license and/or wherever that prevents a clean
> room implementation to be posted out in public. I already have that
> implemented: both the classes in javax.xml.parser and those in
> org.apache.xerces. What should I do? Can I post them?
>
> Pier
