Mike Pogue wrote: > > Hey, Arkin...can we get a C++ version, too, so that the two > Xerces parsers stay together? I'd expect that the Java and > C++ Xerces parsers would want to serialize and canonicalize > identically.
The Java code can be migrated into C++, but I'll have to decline this one, I haven't written a line of C++ in nearly three years, and it's hard to get back. arkin > > Mike > > Assaf Arkin wrote: > > > > OK. Package name changes to org.apache.xerces.serialize > > > > arkin > > > > Tom Palmer wrote: > > > > > > > people confuse because Java semantics are a bit different and more > > > > common. > > > > > > > The trick is having to cope with two groups using the same > > > word in slightly different ways, and any name picked that is > > > nice for Java may end up being bad for another language. > > > > > > It would be good to use the terms that the W3C uses. > > > > > > Adding a qualifier may help at times: DOM serialization vs. > > > Java serialization. Of course, this would only be useful for > > > normal conversation and so on. Package naming is a > > > different issue. > > > > > > - Tom Palmer > > > > -- > > ____________________________________________________________ > > Assaf Arkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > CTO http://www.exoffice.com > > Exoffice, The ExoLab Company tel: (650) 259-9796 -- ____________________________________________________________ Assaf Arkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] CTO http://www.exoffice.com Exoffice, The ExoLab Company tel: (650) 259-9796
