OK, sounds good.  As long as we end up with one set of printers,
rather than two (which I think would be too confusing).

Mike

Assaf Arkin wrote:
> 
> Mike Pogue wrote:
> >
> > Very cool.  Thanks!
> >
> > So, let me make sure I understand. Are there TWO printers of this type
> > (one from Arkin, one already in Xalan somewhere)?  Does Arkin's replace
> > the Xalan one, or does it do something different than the Xalan one, or
> > am I just totally confused here?
> 
> Yes, two printers of the same type. The one in Xalan pretty much does
> the same job, the one I'm contributing just has more features already
> integrated (SAX2, line wrapping, good HTML support).
> 
> The discussion on where to put them is relevant if Xalan would benefit
> from using the same set of printer as Xerces, so we'll end up having
> only one set of printers.
> 
> arkin
> 
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mike
> >
> > Keith Visco wrote:
> > >
> > > I will create the SAX based C++ printers, which will be pretty much a 
> > > straight
> > > port from Assaf's code. Given time I might write the DOM printer that 
> > > sits on
> > > top of the SAX one, but that will come later.
> > >
> > > --Keith
> > >
> > > Assaf Arkin wrote:
> > >
> > > > Mike Pogue wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hey, Arkin...can we get a C++ version, too, so that the two
> > > > > Xerces parsers stay together?  I'd expect that the Java and
> > > > > C++ Xerces parsers would want to serialize and canonicalize
> > > > > identically.
> > > >
> > > > The Java code can be migrated into C++, but I'll have to decline this
> > > > one, I haven't written a line of C++ in nearly three years, and it's
> > > > hard to get back.
> > > >
> > > > arkin
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike
> > > > >
> > > > > Assaf Arkin wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > OK. Package name changes to org.apache.xerces.serialize
> > > > > >
> > > > > > arkin
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tom Palmer wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > people confuse because Java semantics are a bit different and 
> > > > > > > > more
> > > > > > > > common.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The trick is having to cope with two groups using the same
> > > > > > > word in slightly different ways, and any name picked that is
> > > > > > > nice for Java may end up being bad for another language.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It would be good to use the terms that the W3C uses.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Adding a qualifier may help at times: DOM serialization vs.
> > > > > > > Java serialization.  Of course, this would only be useful for
> > > > > > > normal conversation and so on.  Package naming is a
> > > > > > > different issue.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > - Tom Palmer
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > ____________________________________________________________
> > > > > > Assaf Arkin                               [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > CTO                                  http://www.exoffice.com
> > > > > > Exoffice, The ExoLab Company             tel: (650) 259-9796
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > ____________________________________________________________
> > > > Assaf Arkin                               [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > CTO                                  http://www.exoffice.com
> > > > Exoffice, The ExoLab Company             tel: (650) 259-9796
> 
> --
> ____________________________________________________________
> Assaf Arkin                               [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CTO                                  http://www.exoffice.com
> Exoffice, The ExoLab Company             tel: (650) 259-9796

Reply via email to