Tom Palmer wrote: > > > The parser and DOM implementation are necessarily somewhat in bed, unless > > we want to require DOM implementations to use SAX to build it. Do > e? -T. [...] > I haven't actually gotten into Xerces code enough yet to see > how it is currently done. I think the Arkin's OpenXML code > does it this way, though.
I'm sure one of the IBM developers said that XML4C internally uses the SAX interface to build a tree for final DOM exposure. This would seem to be sensible reuse of a SAX parser, although it might raise efficiency questions. Mike. -- Mike Mason, Software Engineer XML Script Development Team Office: 44-1865-203192 http://www.xmlscript.org/ Mobile: 44-7050-288923
