Working on it. The PMC vote is over, and Bugzilla was approved. I'm trying to get Pier to install it ASAP -- but, he is also quite busy, so I've suggested that he can talk to you, Ted, for assistance! :-)
Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > If he didn't report the bug here, nobody has looked into it. > > Repeat after me: > > <whine> > WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW! > WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW! > WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW! > WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW! > WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW! > </whine> > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Assaf Arkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 3:51 PM > Subject: Deferred Element Definition > > > Jason Crickmer has been running into a problem using the deferred DOM. > > > > Apparently with an entity defined as: > > > > <!ENTITY fname "Jason"> > > > > and a reference defines as <body>Hello &fname;,</body> the deferred > > document generates a DeferredElementDefinition instead of a > > DeferredElement or Element. > > > > ui.DOMTreeFull attempts to construct the tree and match the node type > > based on an array, and since ELEMENT_DEFINITION_NODE is not part of the > > node type it supports, it throws an array index out of bounds exception. > > > > Has anyone looked into this problem? > > > > arkin > > > > > > -- > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Assaf Arkin www.exoffice.com > > CTO, Exoffice Technologies, Inc. www.exolab.org > >
