+1
- Re: separate xerces-dev into xerces-c-dev xerces-j-dev... Pierpaolo Fumagalli
- RE: separate xerces-dev into xerces-c-dev xerces-j-dev... Linda Derezinski
- Re: separate xerces-dev into xerces-c-dev xerces-j-dev... Arundhati Bhowmick
- Re: separate xerces-dev into xerces-c-dev xerces-j-dev... Mike Pogue
- Re: separate xerces-dev into xerces-c-dev xerces-j-dev... twleung
- Re: separate xerces-dev into xerces-c-dev xerces-... Pierpaolo Fumagalli
- Re: separate xerces-dev into xerces-c-dev xerces-j-dev... Andy Clark
- Re: separate xerces-dev into xerces-c-dev xerces-... Stefano Mazzocchi
- Re: separate xerces-dev into xerces-c-dev xerces-... Tom Watson
- Re: separate xerces-dev into xerces-c-dev xerces-j-dev... Anupam Bagchi
- Re: separate xerces-dev into xerces-c-dev xerces-j-dev... Rahul Jain
- Re: separate xerces-dev into xerces-c-dev xerces-... Pierpaolo Fumagalli
- Small bug in SAXParser implementation (I beli... Pierpaolo Fumagalli
- Another small bug in DOMParser implementa... Pierpaolo Fumagalli
- The last bug in SAXParser implementation ... Pierpaolo Fumagalli
- Re: The last bug in SAXParser impleme... Andy Clark
- Re: The last bug in SAXParser im... Pierpaolo Fumagalli
- Re: Small bug in SAXParser implementation... Arnaud Le Hors
- Re: Small bug in SAXParser implementa... Pierpaolo Fumagalli
- Re: Small bug in SAXParser imple... Arnaud Le Hors
- Re: separate xerces-dev into xerces-c-dev xer... Tom Watson
