So then should it be:
org.apache.fop.dom.svg
or
org.apache.fop.svg.dom
or
something else?
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnaud Le Hors [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2000 4:32 PM
To: fop-dev@xml.apache.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SVG goes to DOM
> From: Keiron Liddle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 7:08 AM
> To: fop-dev@xml.apache.org
> Subject: SVG
>
> I've had a look at the SVG dom classes.
>
> I will be moving all the svg code into this model once I figure out a few
> things. This means some major restructuring.
Given that the DOM is only made of interfaces, stricktly speaking, you
shouldn't need to go through anything like that. You should be able to
implement the DOM on top of any existing structure. Now, you may still
decide that it is better for you to get your internal structure closer
to what's exposed through the DOM...
> This raises some questions.
>
> should the implementation be placed in
> org.apache.svg.dom.*
I would think not. All xerces classes are in org.apache.xerces.dom. This
allows for several apache implementations to coexist.
> should all implementation classes be called
> <interface name>Impl.java
That's what's done for xerces.
--
Arnaud Le Hors - IBM Cupertino, XML Technology Group
