Does anyone is aware of other works on this topic ? Is there any other w3cschema-aware parser project today ?
I can't find any.. > I'm sure that there will be similar classes. No matter how it works, there > have to be classes that represent the concepts that the schema works in > terms of. I guess the big difference might be that, if we end up with an > 'uber validator' that is really a Schema validator and which just treats a > DTD as a simplistic Schema, then some of the data in them will just be > defaulted in because the DTD has no way to say those things. > > But, other than that, its really too early to say much. Of course you could > look at the partial Schema support in the Java version, but I wouldn't be > so sure that that is really close to how the end product will look, though > I've seen a lot of checkins lately on that stuff, and I assume that its due > to moving the Schema stuff closer to what has been recently discussed > internally. > > ---------------------------------------- > Dean Roddey > Software Weenie > IBM Center for Java Technology - Silicon Valley > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 04/06/2000 06:12:48 PM > > Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: Dean Roddey/Cupertino/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: xerces linking side effect ... > > > > When schemas become a standard, Would there be classes supporting schema > parsing. Like we have the > DTDElement DTDAttribute etc, would schema support involve this. Or would it > be considered as parsing a XML file. It would be beneficial to know what > approach would be taken?? > Kiran > > >
