> They are but not at the IDL level. It has to be done at the language > binding level. BTW we've been told it's a known pb with IDL!...
Ah, so the DOM is specified in IDL, as in OMG's IDL? I didn't know that. > > > I wish JAXP addressed this problem but it doesn't either. :-( > > > > Thanks a lot, W3C! :-( > > W3C isn't the one to blame for JAXP. Sun along with > the JCP participants are. What I meant was, "W3C strikes again," hitting JAXP with the same problem as Xerces. If I had the ear of some committee members, I'd try to convince them to stop using IDL to specify DOM and use UML instead. (The lack of a standard mapping from UML to various implementation languages would then be the next problem, though. Hmm.) Take care. --Sean
