"Perry A. Caro" wrote: > > I was suprised by the change noticed included below. Does this mean > userData on any node is no longer supported? We're using that field for > user data.
Not at all. It's just that the user data is stored in a hashtable on the document instead of on every node. This is already the way it's been working for a while but the field itself on the node wasn't removed. -- Arnaud Le Hors - IBM Cupertino, XML Strategy Group
