Thank you all for your replies. I will check out the websites that some of you have recommended. Also, thank you Arnaud for the perspective on dedicated and generic parsers. That is something i was not aware of and am glad to know about.
Thanks. Rohit. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > To answer your actual question: > > In general a generic parser can't be as fast as a dedicated parser > written to parse some known markup. That's what you get when using 'XML > Data binding'. So, if that suits your need stick with it. The only > reason to use a generic parser instead is if you don't know what input > you're going to get. > -- > Arnaud Le Hors - IBM Cupertino, XML Strategy Group > __________________________________________________________________ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Webmail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/
