> I don't believe that it is a valid schema. My reading of 3.4.2 of
> the Schema recommendation [1], is that the type rrr is a restriction of the ur-type,
> and according to "Complex Type
> Definition with complex content" in the table in 3.4.2, the {content type}
> of rrr is empty.
I think you are right. It's apparently a bug of the spec, not the bug of
Xerces. Thank you very much for your help.
regards,
--
Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI +1 650 786 0721
Sun Microsystems [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
