I like #2. Pull is big enough to justify it.
Ted
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andy Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 9:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Xerces2] Pull Parsing
> Ted Leung wrote:
> > That way everybody to see which control capability was supported.
> > If course we now have more interfaces than there are atoms in the
> > universe, but....
>
> That's what concerns me. XNI is blowing up out of control.
> So do you think we need more discussion before I implement
> something? Which way are you currently leaning?
>
> (1) Replace parse method with setInputSource/parseDocument
> (2) Extend parser configuration interface to create new
> "pull" parser configuration
>
> --
> Andy Clark * IBM, TRL - Japan * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
