Curt Arnold wrote:
>
> Arnaud Le Hors wrote: >>
> Curt Arnold wrote without enough sleep: >
>
> > > You're right there, that's what the spec currently says. But the spec is
> > > wrong, though. It is meant to say the opposite. I just double-checked
> > > with Joe Kesselman who was very much involved in the development of that
> > > spec and who implemented it in Xerces and he confirmed my fears.
> > > I will bring it up to the DOM Working Group, I would expect an erratum
> > > to be published.
> >
> > I had to jump through some serious hoops to implement it as written in my
> > personal Xerces-C DOM Events implementation.
>
> But I wouldn't be upset if it was changed.
For the record, this question was raised to the DOM WG, and on the
public www-dom mailing list.
Well, I'm sorry to report that the spec actually reads as it should. As
Joe and I remembered, it's not what we had first planned. However,
that's what has been decided later on based on public feedback. So we
have a bug in Xerces I will try to fix.
More detail can be found at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/2001JulSep/0257.html
--
Arnaud Le Hors - IBM, XML Standards Strategy Group / W3C AC Rep.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
