PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3228 *** shadow/3228 Wed Aug 22 09:27:13 2001 --- shadow/3228.tmp.25819 Thu Aug 23 01:50:46 2001 *************** *** 2,9 **** | Re-usable XML Schema attribute groups are not being evaluated correctly. | +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bug #: 3228 Product: Xerces-J | ! | Status: RESOLVED Version: 1.4.2 | ! | Resolution: INVALID Platform: Other | | Severity: Major OS/Version: Other | | Priority: Other Component: Schema-Structures | +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ --- 2,9 ---- | Re-usable XML Schema attribute groups are not being evaluated correctly. | +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bug #: 3228 Product: Xerces-J | ! | Status: REOPENED Version: 1.4.2 | ! | Resolution: Platform: Other | | Severity: Major OS/Version: Other | | Priority: Other Component: Schema-Structures | +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ *************** *** 182,184 **** --- 182,220 ---- namespace, but your instance document has them in no namespace. If you change the document to use a prefix for the http://adwuk007/XMLSchema/Test namespace and prefix the attributes then the document will validate. + + + ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-08-23 01:50 ------- + Thanks for your swift response. + I've reviewed your comments and proposed resolution however the schema includes + the attributeFormDefault attribute in the schema which is set to "unqualified". + This means I shouldn't have to prefix attributes. I have to declare a non- + prefixed namespace in the schema otherwise the schema is invalid. + + If I change the schema to the following, removing the reusable attribute group, + then the document validates. I think this clearly shows that re-usable + attribute groups are not being evaluated correctly. + + + <?xml version = "1.0" encoding = "UTF-8"?> + <xsd:schema xmlns = "http://adwuk007/XMLSchema/Test"; + xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; + targetNamespace = "http://adwuk007/XMLSchema/Test"; + version = "5.0" + elementFormDefault = "unqualified" + attributeFormDefault = "unqualified"> + + + <xsd:element name = "Voice"> + <xsd:complexType> + <xsd:attribute name = "countryCode" type + = "xsd:nonNegativeInteger" use = "required"/> + <xsd:attribute name = "areaCode" type + = "xsd:nonNegativeInteger" use = "required"/> + <xsd:attribute name = "number" type + = "xsd:nonNegativeInteger" use = "required"/> + <xsd:attribute name = "leaveMessage" type + = "xsd:boolean" default = "false"/> + </xsd:complexType> + </xsd:element> + </xsd:schema> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
