PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3277

*** shadow/3277 Tue Sep  4 05:37:54 2001
--- shadow/3277.tmp.22865       Tue Sep  4 07:53:11 2001
***************
*** 40,43 ****
  Hi Pete. Could you check whether there is a large "maxOccurs" value in your 
  schema file(s)? It's a known limitation that Xerces1 schema can't handle large 
  occurrence values. But in most cases, you can use maxOccurs="unbounded" 
! instead. Thx.
--- 40,52 ----
  Hi Pete. Could you check whether there is a large "maxOccurs" value in your 
  schema file(s)? It's a known limitation that Xerces1 schema can't handle large 
  occurrence values. But in most cases, you can use maxOccurs="unbounded" 
! instead. Thx.
! 
! ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2001-09-04 07:53 -------
! The greatest maxOccurs value is 9999, the next biggest one is 999.
! I replaced both with maxOccurs="unbounded" as you suggested and it
! works.
! 
! Thx. for your help.
!  
! Pete

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to