Pavani Mukthipudi wrote:
> Andy Clark wrote :
> > (-) Remove the Attribute Entity Information
>
> If you are talking about removing all the entity related methods
> from the XMLAttributes interface and adding utility classes instead,
> it would be a good idea 'cause attributes donot have entity
> references when we use a schema grammar.
I don't see how this is related to simplifying the
XMLAttributes interface.
> > (+) Add Non-Normalized Value to Internal Entity Decl
>
> This is, of course, needed if we remove the entity related methods from
> XMLAttributes interface.
That's not really the point of adding the information but,
you're right, it does allow the entity information to be
retrieved if the entities are removed from the
XMLAttributes interface. But the added information in the
callback would also be useful for knowing what parameter
entities were used within other parameter entities. This
is the point that I started thinking about after hearing
of James Clark's tool.
--
Andy Clark * IBM, TRL - Japan * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
