Sandy wrote:- > We are so happy to see that you guys are actively involved in the new > schema design/implementation. Just I guess we need to do a better > coordinating job. As Elena and Neil pointed out, there are lots of redesign > work need to be done in the validator, and we need a new design of the > datatype validators. These are relatively independent pieces, so we won't > step on each other's toes. > Yes Sandy, I also think the same, we need better coordination. I can see, the issues we have are schema validator, implementation of grammar caching, datatype validator & implementation of traversers. I appreciate, the way you discussed the your design/framework of datatype validator in open before actually writing much code.I hope, we will follow the same in future which would lead to a better coordination. I do see by resolving the design/framework issues & communicating, we can help each other to complete the full schema validation. Cheers Gopal ----------------------- SUN Microsystems, India --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
