David Brownell wrote: > > Re what to do ... changing the default behavior of a SAX2 parser isn't > something that could be done while retaining backwards compatibility.
I don't think adopting this change will break backwards compatibility: the information that users get today will remain unchanged. We will provide one additional piece of information - namespace for namespace attributes and I don't see how this may break users code... ? I believe that it is better to try to expose consistent information via different APIs (e.g. DOM/SAX). Since Infoset and DOM already require assigning a namespace to NS attributes and I think it is only a matter of time the Namespace spec requires it too, it is better to have a consistent model. For more information, please refer to http://www.w3.org/2000/xmlns/ documentation. -- Elena Litani / IBM Toronto --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
