Andy Clark wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > What do people think? Is providing a DTD-only configuration > > worth having an extra class? > > Or we could use the validation/schema feature to determine > whether the Schema validator is included in the parsing > pipeline during the configurePipeline() method. We could > even lazily construct the Schema validator in that method > so that we don't create any more objects than necessary. > This doesn't remove the compilation dependency but works > pretty well otherwise.
Did you all consider other schema languages? What if someone wanted to use RelaxNG, for example? Not sure what the solution should be, though. The downside to deriving another class is complexity. -Edwin PS: Sorry for not responding earlier. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
