Petr Kuzel wrote: > recent version of XNI contains many XMLDocumentHandler and XMLDTDHandler > methods with the same name and parameters except the Augmentations > parameter. Should not we add Augmentations parameter also to > XMLDTDHandler callbacks? (just curious)
I guess the reasoning is just that we didn't see a need to ever add arbitrary information to the DTD declarations and information. Do you have any use cases that require this change? > With exception of XMLDTDHandler.characters() that could be renamed, > as somebody suggested, to ignoredText(). Yeah, this name has bothered me for quite some time. I'm in favor of changing the name if others agree. > Again, why XMLAttributes.setValue() overwrites also non-normalized > value? (causes trouble) Good point. This should change. Also, what do people think about adding the following method to XMLAttributes? public void setValues(String value, String nonNormalizedValue); -- Andy Clark * [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
