Neil Graham wrote :
>
> I envisage XMLGrammarPoolImpl as being a very simple collection of a
> couple of hashtables for DTD's and schemas. They could probably hash
> directly on the XMLGrammarDescriptions for these types of grammars.
>
If we plan to use XMLGrammarDescription as the key, don't you think
we have to change the signature of XMLGrammarPool's
cacheGrammar(String grammarType, Grammar[] grammars) method
to
cacheGrammar(XMLGrammarDescription[] descriptions, Grammar[] grammars)
Moreover, we need not pass the grammarType 'cause the application can
get it from the getGrammarType() method.
Also, do we need 2 separate hashtables for DTDs and Schemas when we
hash on the XMLGrammarDescriptions. Or am I missing something ?
What do you think ?
> Have I missed anything? Do folks think this will work? Even more
> important, since I won't be around all that much this month--I've got
> some vacation time coming up and some other commitments--anyone want
> to help?
>
Yes, I would like to help.
> Any suggestions on how the work might be broken down?
>
I can see XMLGrammarConfiguration, XMLDTDValidator, XMLGrammarPool and,
may be, XMLSchemaValidator are the classes which will need major work.
I'm ready to help you in implementing/modifying these classes.
-Pavani
--
Pavani Mukthipudi
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Phone: 080 - 2298989 Extn: 87390
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
