I think having an HTML parser available is definitely a Good Idea.
One question: A huge percentage of the files out there which claim to be HTML aren't, or at least aren't correct HTML. Browsers are generally very forgiving and attempt to read past those errors.... but exactly how they recover varies from browser to browser, so consistancy of respose to those documents is a problem. Does this HTML prototype attempt that kind of recovery? Should it? And if it should, does it doecument what approach it's using so it can be compered with the various browsers and/or W3C's "tidy" tool? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
